NASA's Artemis Moon Mission Faces Collapse Amid Failures and Political Shifts

NASA's Artemis Moon Mission Faces Collapse Amid Failures and Political Shifts

Janet Carey
Janet Carey
3 Min.
Black and white collage of four lunar surface images, each with a small central hole, and text at the bottom.

NASA's Artemis Moon Mission Faces Collapse Amid Failures and Political Shifts

NASA's Artemis Moon Program Faces an Uncertain Future

The list of problems is long. U.S. President Donald Trump now wants to abandon the program entirely.

The Artemis program has become a symbol of the often erratic policies of the current U.S. president. Originally, a crewed moon landing was meant to crown the end of Donald Trump's second term as a triumphant achievement. Yet despite a four-year head start, it now seems unlikely that Americans will walk on the lunar surface again by 2028.

So far, only Artemis I—a test flight around the moon with three mannequins aboard—was completed in late 2022. The mission revealed that the Orion spacecraft's heat shield was defective. Since then, the problems have mounted: despite high-profile presentations, there are still no functional spacesuits. Reports also emerged that a single rocket launch could cost up to four billion euros.

Meanwhile, Elon Musk's Starship has made headlines mostly for its explosive failures. The 200-ton behemoth was supposed to have already ferried astronauts from the Orion capsule to the lunar surface. But first, it must be refueled in Earth's orbit—a maneuver that, according to current estimates, would require around a dozen rocket launches within just a few days. It could take years before the Starship becomes reliable enough for the task.

The alternative would be Blue Origin's New Glenn, another private lunar rocket that has at least reached Earth's orbit. However, it too would need in-space refueling and isn't scheduled for use until later Artemis missions.

While China's space agency plans to test the first stage of its Long March 10 rocket next year, the U.S. is slowly waking up to its precarious position. NASA is already considering rebidding the Artemis flights. After all, the stakes are higher than just prestige—the program is also about mining lunar resources.

And Donald Trump? He appears to sense the looming disaster. After slashing NASA's budget, he now wants to cancel the program after Artemis III. Instead of the 380,000-kilometer journey to the moon, he aims to send the Starship on a far more ambitious—some would say reckless—mission: at least 60 million kilometers to Mars. Humanity has yet to land anything heavier than a ton there, let alone overcome the many near-insurmountable challenges such a voyage would entail.

The Starship is currently in its third iteration, and just weeks ago, one of its tanks ruptured on the launchpad. The first test flight will likely not take place until spring at the earliest. The problematic engines have been redesigned but remain the system's Achilles' heel. Some experts have called for a significant downsizing of the spacecraft—a change that would require years of additional development.

Europe's hopes of hitching a ride are also in jeopardy. The European Space Agency recently announced that the three promised seats on Artemis missions would go to Germany, France, and Italy. Whether those flights will ever happen, however, remains written in the stars.