Australia's social media ban for under-16s sparks global debate after 100 days

Australia's ban on social media for under-16s has completed its first 100 days, with the government declaring the policy a success. Introduced on December 10, 2025, the measure has drawn comparisons to alcohol restrictions for minors, though enforcing it remains a challenge. Meanwhile, the UK is now testing its own approach with a pilot programme involving 300 teenagers. Australia's ban took effect last December, sparking widespread debate both at home and abroad. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese defended the move, arguing it would become a societal norm—much like age limits on alcohol. While enforcement has proven difficult, the policy has influenced global discussions, with Germany's CDU party proposing a similar ban for under-14s.

In the UK, the government has launched a six-week pilot to explore restrictions for teens aged 13 to 17. The study will divide participants into groups, each facing different constraints. Some will have platforms like TikTok and Snapchat completely blocked, while others will test nighttime curfews or daily time limits. Parents involved in the trial will receive guidance on applying these rules to their children's devices. The UK's interest in stricter controls follows a divided political response. Earlier this year, the House of Lords backed a ban for under-16s, but the House of Commons rejected the idea. Results from the pilot could now shape future debates on social media restrictions for young people.

Australia's policy has set a precedent, prompting other nations to reconsider their own rules. The UK's pilot programme may offer clearer evidence on what works best for limiting teen social media use. Both countries will watch closely as the debate over digital safety for young people continues.