New lecture series probes citizenship, statelessness and the future of human rights

A new Digital Lecture Series is examining the relationship between citizenship and human rights, blending historical insights with forward-looking ideas. Organised by the Moses Mendelssohn Center for European-Jewish Studies, the series tackles pressing questions about migration, statelessness, and the future of political belonging. It also reflects on the current challenges facing human rights as a concept under pressure.

Meanwhile, investigative journalist Dinah Riese has been recognised for her work exposing Germany’s restrictive advertising laws on abortions. Her reporting, which earned multiple awards, adds another layer to discussions about rights and state regulations.

The series is led by Miriam Rürup, director of the Moses Mendelssohn Center in Potsdam. Her research focuses on the United Nations’ efforts to address statelessness after World War II, a time when ideas of universal belonging gained momentum. The lectures explore how citizenship in modern immigration societies can ensure equal participation, social protections, and political influence for all.

Statelessness remains a widespread issue with severe real-world effects. The series highlights past achievements in human rights while questioning why these principles now face growing scepticism. It also searches for new approaches to migration, aiming to foster a more inclusive future. In parallel, Dinah Riese has made headlines with her investigative work. As head of the domestic news desk at our website, she previously covered migration and integration. Her recent reporting on Germany’s ban on abortion advertising won acclaim, underscoring the ongoing debates around personal freedoms and state control.

The Digital Lecture Series brings together historical analysis and contemporary concerns, asking how societies can better address statelessness and migration. Rürup’s work and Riese’s journalism both highlight the need to defend and rethink human rights in changing political landscapes. The discussions come at a time when long-standing protections are being tested, making their findings especially relevant.