San Diego's $2B Powerlink Sparks Wildfire Fears and Local Backlash
San Diego's $2B Powerlink Sparks Wildfire Fears and Local Backlash
San Diego's $2B Powerlink Sparks Wildfire Fears and Local Backlash
San Diego Gas & Electric has proposed a major new power transmission project. The Golden Pacific Powerlink would stretch 150 miles from the Imperial Valley Substation to Camp Pendleton. It aims to boost renewable energy and improve reliability across California. The project involves building a system of 500-kilovolt transmission lines and tower structures. The route would pass through Anza-Borrego State Park and southern Riverside County, including Temecula’s wine country. SDG&E claims it would increase renewable energy supply, lower costs, and strengthen the grid during extreme weather.
Strong opposition has emerged. Residents and city leaders in Temecula argue the project risks wildfires, poses health concerns, and would harm the area’s rural charm. The Riverside County Board of Supervisors has already voted unanimously against it. State officials, including Assembly member Kate Sanchez and Senator Kelly Seyarto, share wildfire safety concerns.
Cal Fire Local 288, representing Riverside County firefighters, has also voiced opposition. A Change.org petition against the project has gathered nearly 9,800 signatures. Temecula City Council plans to reconfirm its official opposition in a July meeting. SDG&E remains in the early planning stages and has not yet finalised the route. The Golden Pacific Powerlink faces widespread resistance from local communities and officials. Concerns centre on wildfire risks, health impacts, and damage to the landscape. SDG&E continues to develop the project, but its future depends on addressing these objections.