New podcast tackles benchmarking disputes after Resident Evil Requiem controversy

A new podcast will dive into the world of benchmarking after conflicting results from two tech outlets sparked debate. The discussion follows disagreements over Resident Evil Requiem's path-tracing performance, where ComputerBase and PC Games Hardware published differing findings. Three experts will explore how testing methods shape outcomes and why discrepancies happen in the first place.

The controversy began when ComputerBase and PC Games Hardware released separate benchmarks for Resident Evil Requiem's path-tracing mode. Their results showed noticeable differences, raising questions about testing reliability. To address this, the two outlets teamed up for a joint podcast.

ComputerBase later ran five extra test scenes, working with PC Games Hardware to check the original data. While none of the new scenes matched PCGH's initial figures, the results still varied widely. Performance swings ranged from +6.4% to +25.2% in favour of the RTX 4090, proving both sets of findings were correct—but also highlighting how scene selection affects outcomes. The podcast will feature Raff and Wolfgang as panellists, with Jan moderating the conversation. They plan to break down benchmarking steps, key factors testers should watch, and why methodology matters in performance reviews.

The collaborative episode aims to clarify how benchmarking works and why results can differ. By analysing Resident Evil Requiem's case, the team will show how test conditions influence data. The discussion also serves as a guide for readers interpreting future hardware reviews.